Saturday January 19 (Venous session)
|
 |
| 08.00 | Welcome address, J-L. Gérard | |||
| Moderators |
SESSION I: POST THROMBOTIC SYNDROME - ATYPICAL VARICOSE VEINS A. Bisdorff |
|||
| 08.15 | IVUS: should it be used more extensively in deep venous reconstructive surgery? P. Neglen  |
|||
| 08.25 | Evolution of the neovalve technique and for which patients? M. Lugli |
|||
| 08.35 | Do perforator veins always need to be treated or should treatment be limited to C5 and C6 venous disease and how? P. Gloviczki |
|||
| 08.45 | Atypical varicose vein from gluteal source | |||
| 08.45 | Atypical varicose veins from gluteal source: etiopathogeny and how to point them out, P. Lemasle |
|||
| 08.55 | Endovascular treatment of atypical varicose veins originating from the inferior gluteal vein, M. Greiner |
|||
| 09.05 | Sclerosing agent: clarification of venous lesion treatment, A. Bisdorff | |||
| 09.15 | Discussion | |||
Moderators |
SESSION II: TREATMENT OF THE SMALL SAPHENOUS VEIN. DEBATE: THE SAFEST OR THE MOST EFFICIENT? I. Vanhandenhove, M. S. Whiteley, G. Jantet |
|||
| 09.20 | MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage? | |||
| 09.30 | Is it safe and efficient to treat the small saphenous vein: | |||
| by surgery, D. Creton |
||||
| by radiofrequency ablation, J. Lawson |
||||
| by sclerotherapy (foam) | ||||
| by endovenous laser ablation, J-L. Gérard | ||||
| 10.00 | MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in terms of your procedures? |
|||
| 10.10 | Break in the exhibition hall | |||
Moderators |
SESSION III: COMPETENCE OR INCOMPETENCE OF THE TERMINAL AND PRE-TERMINAL VALVE: DOES IT CHANGE YOUR MODE OF TREATMENT? M. Perrin,T. Proebstle |
|||
| 10.40 | MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage? | |||
| 10.50 | Different patterns of reflux at the saphenous femoral junction. Is it easy to identify them and how? O. Pichot | |||
| 11.00 | Hemodynamics of the saphenous-femoral junction. Patterns of reflux and their clinical implications, M. Cappelli | |||
| 11.10 | If the terminal and/or pre terminal is competent or incompetent, does it change your mode of treatment? | |||
| by foam, C. Hamel Desnos |
||||
| by surgery, P. Pittaluga |
||||
| by endovenous ablation, J. Labastie | ||||
| 11.40 | MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in terms of your procedures? | |||
| 12.00 | Visit of the exhibition hall | |||
| 13.00 | Lunch in the exhibition hall | |||
Moderators |
SESSION IV: MISCELLANOUS M. Lugli |
|||
| 14.00 | QoL evaluation and chronic venous disease: how to carry this out during our daily practice? A. Mansilha |
|||
| 14.10 | Impact of the environment/the welcome, etc., on the well being of the patients (day surgery) and their satisfaction rate, I. Vanhandenhove | |||
| 14.20 | Randomized controlled trials in varicose veins endovenous treatment. A critical review, M. Perrin |
|||
| 14.30 | Discussion | |||
Moderators |
SESSION V: THERMAL TECHNIQUES L. Kabnick, M. S. Whiteley |
|||
| 14.40 | Which one do you prefer: laser, radiofrequency, steam or super glue ablation? MCQ from clinical cases: what is your opinion at this stage? |
|||
| 14.50 | 5 year follow up: between the different therapeutic options, what is the best? L. Rasmussen | |||
| 15.00 | Optimising outcomes after endovenous interventions – is technique more important than choice of catheter? M. Gohel | |||
| 15.10 | Endovenous laser Update: New Wavelength or New Fiber? L. Kabnick |
|||
| 15.20 | Endovenous laser ablation: results and evolution of the procedure from the beginning, G. Spreafico |
|||
| 15.30 | Now that we have 5 year data on Closure Fast and Closure: is there a difference? T. Proebstle | |||
| 15.40 | Cyanoacrylate-superglue for GSV ablation: is it ready for unrestricted use? T. Proebstle | |||
| 15.50 | Radial endovenous laser vs RF ablation: advantages-disadvantages, M. S. Whiteley |
|||
| 16.00 | Celon Radiofrequency: results and evolution of the procedure from the beginning, C. Hamel Desnos |
|||
| 16.10 | Indications for preferring endovenous laser treatment to traditional surgery: ten years’ experience of a single center, C. Spartera |
|||
| 16.20 | Treatment of the great saphenous vein GSV and their tributaries by steam: first results, Y. Alimi | |||
| 16.30 | MCQ and discussion: have you changed your mind after these presentations and debates in terms of your procedures? | |||
| 16.40 | Discussion and conclusion, J-L.Gérard, P. Gloviczki, M. Perrin | |||
| 16.50 | Adjournment |